|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeWatchesMen'sCasual |
|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review: Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
No more Achilles heel! Jan 31, 2008 When searching for the perfect watch, this one kept catching my eye - aesthetically and practically the best watch I've found. I was worried about buying the watch after reading many reports about the iPhone-like shattering of the crystal. Worry no more! Skagen has replaced the crystal with super-hardened, scratch-resistant mineral crystal. I have owned this watch for 3 weeks now, have not taken it off and have had no problems - that's saying a lot since I am very hard on the equipment. It is so wafer-thin you won't realize its there! The only drawback for me is the large diameter which is still taking some getting used to.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Fine for office wear Aug 19, 2007 A decent, lightweight, thin, stylish watch - suitable for the office or out on the town. The band fits like a bracelet versus a "regular" watchband.
I've owned it for a few months now and haven't had any problems.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Great watch, great price Aug 16, 2007 First saw this watch on a "special" on a trip from Hong Kong. When I got home, the Amazon price was considerably better. The watch is elegant, super thin, and a very attractive face. It came with a nice guarantee both from Skagen and Amazon. To date, I am a very satisfied owner.
1 of 2 found the following review helpful:
yes, it's true Jun 20, 2007 Just like the others who have reviewed this watch, the crystal on mine broke less than a week after I received it from Amazon. I took a short nap and woke up to realize that my watch face had shattered. I did not hit it against anything and there was no excessive pressure applied to the crystal. It is obviously a design flaw and I will ask for a replacement model.
5 of 5 found the following review helpful:
Nice to look at, just don't wear it. Apr 30, 2007 A nice looking watch, but way too fragile. The glass covering the watch face broke the second day I wore it.
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|